

The Conference on Cyber Dissidents highlighted the work, methods, courage and achievements of its eight dissident guest speakers, from seven nations. Five of these nations are places where freedom has been extinguished (all rated “not free” by Freedom House): China, Cuba, Iran, Syria, and Russia. Two others are places where freedom is in peril (both rated “partly free” by Freedom House) because of an authoritarian government accumulating more power, as in Venezuela, or because of the threat of internal terrorist groups, as in Colombia.
All of the dissidents who were able to join the Conference are key leaders; several must live in exile; two have served extensive time as political prisoners. And all of them have made use of new online, Internet and mobile technologies in their non-violent struggle against state oppression, lack of press freedom and official and unofficial terror and violence.
The Conference is the inaugural event of the The George W. Bush Institute’s Area of Focus on Human Freedom, and includes the Institute’s first two Visiting Fellows in Human Freedom: Oscar Morales, from Colombia, and Mohsen Sazegara, from Iran. The co-sponsor of the event was Freedom House, the non-partisan organization founded by Eleanor Roosevelt and Wendell Willkie in 1941.
The Conference honored the work and the courage of the dissidents who spoke and the aspirations for freedom in each of their countries they represent. As James K. Glassman told the attendees, the Bush Institute and Freedom House hope their work “will become a beacon to others, who can be both inspired and educated. At few times in history, has work like theirs been more important.”
And when the “voices of freedom and tolerance face serious challenges,” as Laura W. Bush said, President Bush “and I believe it is vital that they know that the people of the United States stand behind them.” But the Institute’s mission is not merely to appreciate the great ideas and (in this case) the courage of people who stand up for them, but to take action that engages and enables these ideas to work in the practical world. Accordingly, the Conference’s work focused on two challenges:
Today’s dissidents have more ways than ever to exchange information, organize resistance, and share their message with the outside world. At the same time, the same advances in technology also enable repressive governments not only to meet these efforts, but themselves to become more efficient at censorship, identifying dissenters and quashing expressions of dissent in the press, on the Internet or in the streets. The Conference’s two goals were to bring dissidents together to share best practices and learn from one another, and to learn ourselves what we in America and other democracies can do to aid the work of dissidents – in particular, to help them protect and enhance their high-tech tools and counter the technological counter-assaults from government and terror groups. The fascinating practical discussions among the dissidents were framed by presentations from many U.S. experts which put their struggle in context, and reported on the use of cyber tools by repressive regimes.
Christopher Walker and Robert Guerra from Freedom House presented their new research, just released today, about how authoritarian governments such as those in China, Iran and Russia are pursuing media and information strategies that are increasingly sophisticated – and are in the habit of sharing their expertise with one another. China, for example, has been at the forefront of a growing trend toward “outsourcing” censorship and surveillance to private companies – ISPs, cybercafés, and mobile phone providers. These governments are at the forefront of a kind of globalization of authoritarianism. The Berkman Center’s Ethan Zuckerman and Hal Roberts discussed their work on how “circumvention technology” can work to evade online censorship. David Keyes, the director of the private organization CyberDissidents.org contributed his insights to the problem as well. Several speakers from past and present U.S. Administrations and from the U.S. State Department, all of whom had or still have direct responsibility for supporting democracy and good governance abroad.
The luncheon keynote was Dr. Jeffrey Gedmin, who is President and CEO of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. We also heard from Daniel Baer, Deputy Assistant Secretary of the State Department’s Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor; Jennifer L. Windsor, Executive Director of Freedom House, who worked at USAID as Director of the Center for Democracy and Governance during both Clinton Administrations; Steve Hadley, who served in the Administrations of George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush (as National Security Advisor to the President); and three others who served in President Bush’s Administration: Goli Ameri, now a member of Freedom House’s board who was Assistant Secretary of State; Kristen Silverberg, who was U.S. Ambassador to the E.U., and of course Jim Glassman, who was Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy.
The message was clear – Americans and American Administrations from before the fall of the Berlin Wall to today have made a difference to those who are struggling for human freedom. This support must and will continue – but we need to be aware of changing circumstances. While the desire for human freedom in the face of oppression is an absolute, the means to achieve freedom and how those who desire it join hands with others is constantly changing and developing. The desire for freedom can be also described as an intellectual and political discipline, as Dr. Peter Ackerman spoke of it at the conference: a technique that can be learned, improved and perfected. But like any discipline that can be learned, its practitioners need to keep abreast of new developments and new tools that change the techniques and methods.
The Conference on Cyber Dissidents was a first step, an investigation, toward the ultimate goal of developing a plan of action that can be used by many – nonviolent dissidents themselves, of course, but also by those in our government, in non-profits, and even by such companies with technological prowess and a sense of human citizenship as Google and Facebook, to ensure that the cyber tools that empower freedom of expression and communication are kept free of interference from the enemies of freedom.